George Stinney To Get Retrial 70 Years Later

George Stinney To Get Retrial 70 Years Later

( 4UMF NEWS ) George Stinney To Get Retrial 70 Years Later:

On June 16, 1944, 14-year-old George Stinney Jr. became the youngest person executed in the 20th century.

Tried and convicted of murdering two girls months before in Alcolu, South Carolina, Stinney’s small frame didn’t even fit properly on the electric chair, according to newspaper reports at the time.

He weighed 95 pounds and stood just over five feet tall. He was executed in an oak electric chair built only for adults.

A 27-page motion was filed on October 25 to grant Stinney a new trial and a chance to posthumously clear his name – some 70 years later.

“We are confident that we can present enough evidence that the judge will look at this from the standard of today and say, ‘this was not justice that was served back in 1944,’” said Steve McKenzie, lead counsel on the Stinney case.

The push for a new trial and the opportunity to fully and legally exonerate Stinney is largely symbolic. His trial in 1944 lasted only a few hours. The jury deliberated for 10 minutes. Stinney was sentenced to death by electrocution.

No appeal was filed.

“We cannot undo that,” McKenzie said of Stinney’s ultimate fate. “Our justice system is not perfect, but it’s the best in the world. And at that time, we believe this was one of the times the justice system failed. It’s a terrible set of facts and terrible set of circumstances.”

“But if we don’t protect George Stinney, we don’t protect anyone,” McKenzie said.

Alcolu was a racially-divided mill town. The two girls who were found murdered, Betty June Binnicker and Mary Emma Thames, were white, and the community was eager for their killer to be brought to justice.

Stinney, a young black boy, allegedly said he had seen the girls earlier that day.

Today, there remains no record of the trial. No witnesses were called on Stinney’s behalf.

Charles and George’s other living sibling Amie Ruffner provided sworn statements which are included in the motion, claiming their brother was with family members at the time of the murders.

Since 2011, McKenzie and his firm have been pursuing leads, researching and interviewing potential witnesses.

“The easy way out is to deny [a new trial],” said Kenneth Gaines, an associate professor of law at University of South Carolina Law School. “It’s a lot harder to go ahead and say, ‘I’m going to take these facts and line these up in favor of defense and reopen this thing.’”

Gaines, who reviewed the motion, puts the chances of a judge granting a new trial at 30 percent. He said the passage of time and the lack of any new physical evidence is a “headache.”

“We have our Constitution, it evolves as we go,” Gaines said of how Stinney could have even been killed in the first place. “It just doesn’t evolve fast enough.”

A South Carolina historian, George Frierson, has been researching the Stinney case for several years. His interview about the case in a South Carolina newspaper was what attracted McKenzie to pursue a new trial in the first place.

It was also personal.

“I never knew that the youngest person executed in the U.S. in the 20th century was tried and convicted in the same courthouse that I had been practicing law in for 20 years,” McKenzie said.

A spokesman for the South Carolina Attorney General’s Office told the Associated PressJeffrey Collins that their lawyers had no comment because the case is pending.

A hearing date for a judge to review the motion filed has not been set. McKenize and his team said they hope the Stinney case can be resolved before the end of the year.



5 comments for “George Stinney To Get Retrial 70 Years Later

Jackie Rawlings

Posted on

Years ago we studied this case and it was clear it was a rushed trial for the public as cries were made to kill this child. An appointed accountant who never did a criminal case was assigned, the parents ordered to leave town and as people said a relative of the real killer as a juror. Police wrote the confession which surely George could not read as ice cream was offered. This dark mark on South Carolina would never have come to light if the killer had not confessed his crime and asked for forgiveness before he died. Justice is suppose to be for all even if it comes to late. George Stinney was an innocent child executed because in America rights were not given to blacks and the horror of the murder of two white girls needed someone to pay and George was chosen.

    Snazzy Snook

    Posted on

    Awww Jackie, your libtard heart is bleeding profusly .. The Groid was GUILTY, period .


Posted on

Sorry libtards. 70 years later, STILL guilty!


Posted on

Stinney was executed, the two girls are dead. Retry the case 100 times and nothing changes.

Snazzy Snook

Posted on

If he didn’t fit properly in the chair they should have hanged him .. GUILTY !!!

Leave a Reply